Comments on: Photo-based traffic enforcement in Arizona raises protest among citizens

By: Jerry Vierra

Jerry Vierra — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:53:49 +0000

Ed brought up a good point. The state of Arizona has a judicial productivity cerdit system in place for judges. these are kickbacks. Their annual salery is determined upon the volume of, let’s say, traffic citation credits. They receive a percentage of the sum. In my book, Traffic Citation Scheme, there are several examples of kickbacks and bribes used in this traffic citation scheme in Arizona. This is the largest criminal theft in Arizona’s recorded history. It is not public safety, it is revenue generating!

By: Ed

Ed — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 09:37:12 +0000

Even tho’ it’s a growth industry, I think camera company stocks are a bad investment. The companies may have to make big refunds in California, because many of the contracts they have entered into are alleged to violate the law barring compensation computed upon a percentage of the revenue from the court to the city hosting the cameras. (Cal. Veh. Code Sec. 21455.5(g))

By: 4409

4409 — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 07:09:45 +0000

The Cameras are a straight out fraud…

I would say sue the cameras companies and the state but they are all one and the same. Same thugs running different schemes.

The courts are just a big a fraud just different actors.

The solution is not suing and nor putting it up for fraudulent diebold vote but deny them the very thing that they need to survive and that it cash and credability.

They only have one of these elements as we speak and when the other is removed….. and it will be, they will disappear, it’s just that simple!