<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where is the compact camera with digital SLR performance?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photo.blorge.com/2007/07/26/where-is-the-compact-camera-with-digital-slr-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photo.blorge.com/2007/07/26/where-is-the-compact-camera-with-digital-slr-performance/</link>
	<description>Photography tutorials and digital camera news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:21:19 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://photo.blorge.com/2007/07/26/where-is-the-compact-camera-with-digital-slr-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-3293</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 11:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photo.blorge.com/2007/07/26/where-is-the-compact-camera-with-digital-slr-performance/#comment-3293</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad to know that I&#039;m not alone.  Sooner or later manufacturers are bound to wake up and smell the coffee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to know that I&#8217;m not alone.  Sooner or later manufacturers are bound to wake up and smell the coffee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Kashi</title>
		<link>http://photo.blorge.com/2007/07/26/where-is-the-compact-camera-with-digital-slr-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-3288</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Kashi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 06:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photo.blorge.com/2007/07/26/where-is-the-compact-camera-with-digital-slr-performance/#comment-3288</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with this post and have been searching hard for precisely this sort of camera.  I prefer not to carry a bulky dust-prone dSLR but still want the same level of quality and enlargement.  Although I am inclined toward a Richo GX100 as the best of the current lot, I must say that an optical viewfinder would be very nice for quick shooting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with this post and have been searching hard for precisely this sort of camera.  I prefer not to carry a bulky dust-prone dSLR but still want the same level of quality and enlargement.  Although I am inclined toward a Richo GX100 as the best of the current lot, I must say that an optical viewfinder would be very nice for quick shooting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
